CANBERRA, Australia - AussieJournal -- Originally outlined in 1959, the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model remains a popular method for analysing and evaluating the efficacy of training programs at different phases of the learning journey. There have, however, been some changes to the model over the years to better reflect a new world of work and way of learning. In their latest article, the Acorn subject matter experts run through why the training evaluation is important, how the Kirkpatrick model has evolved and how to use it to evaluate training programs.

At a high level, a training evaluation model tells you if learning isn't actually solving business pain points or if it's impactful on the employee day to day. But these don't have to be the reason to use the Kirkpatrick model. The focus just needs to be on improving training and evaluation itself.

"Proving the strategic impact of L&D can't be done without some structure," said Blake Proberts (Co-Founder and Managing Director). "A training evaluation model ensures L&D leaders are consistently refining their efforts in line with organisational outcomes and workforce needs."

More on Aussie Journal

• $10 Million Allocated to Establish Crypto Treasury Focused on High Value Ethereum (ETH) & Bitcoin (BTC) as Long-Term Holdings for Cybersecurity Leader
• Cummings Graduate Institute for Behavioral Health Studies Celebrates New DBH Graduates
• $100 to $200 Million Equity Agreement with Top Digital Advisor Bitwise to Power Major Digital Asset Initiative for Bitcoin and Solana: OFA Group
• New Collaboration Launches Corporate ESG Solution for Responsible Decommissioning and Transparent Reporting
• SlickCashLoan Launches Free Loan Calculator to Help You Plan Monthly Payments

The Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model contains four levels of training evaluation: Reaction, learning, behaviour and results. Each level is important because it has an impact on the following one. One level can't be skipped to get to another. It's a flow on effect.

Reaction is about determining how learners superficially respond to a training program. Learning is for looking at what was or wasn't learned. Behaviour delves into the influence of workplace culture on behaviour change. Results look at the outcomes that occurred because an employee completed training and received subsequent reinforcement.

The updated model brings forward several adjustments. Some of these include putting less emphasis on the reaction phase, better bridging the gap between learning and behaviour, strengthening evaluation points and taking an organisational view of the results phase.

The Acorn experts believe to best apply the updated model, organisations should start from the results level – define results first to avoid working on assumptions. Next determine performance indicators at the behaviour level. Lastly, evaluate learning and delivery and support at the learning and reaction level.

More on Aussie Journal

• World Landscape Architecture Unveils Highly Anticipated 2025 WLA Awards Shortlist
• TikTok Star ArcadeFriends Attempts 24-Hour Claw Machine Marathon at Lucky Puppy Arcade in Las Vegas
• Pyro Marketing Launches New Website to Accelerate Growth for Fitness Brands
• KCON LA 2025, 106.3 RAIN FM 'Take Over' Special Event
• The Citizens Commission on Human Rights Annual Purple Heart Day Event will be Hosted at the Historic Fort Harrison

You can read the Acorn experts' full article about the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model on Acorn Labs: https://hubs.ly/Q01hxrcJ0

Pursuit Technology is one of Australia's fastest growing HR technology companies. Pursuit, via Acorn LMS, takes a different view to strategically enabling HR and L&D teams compared to traditional providers. Rather than focusing on analytics after learning experience, their products use workforce planning and capability frameworks prior to any learning. By linking to a company's strategy, Pursuit products can inform organisational capability gaps and suggest education, deliver this education, then measure the impact – proving business impact by the HR and L&D team in a quantifiable way.