LOS ANGELES - AussieJournal -- Citizens Commission on Human Rights International, a mental health industry watchdog, welcomes the increasing numbers of attorneys representing survivors of the troubled teen treatment system, seeking justice for the abuse many have suffered in behavioral hospitals. On August 27, three Alabama law firms filed a lawsuit against a for-profit behavioral hospital for youths, detailing the severe physical and emotional abuse inflicted on a 17-year-old boy, identified as "M.C.," while he was a resident there in 2023.[1]

"What M.C. endured is a betrayal of trust, and we are committed to seeking justice on his behalf," attorney Tommy James said, adding, "No child should endure what this child and others have faced at this facility. The conditions and treatment are horrendous, and those responsible must be held accountable. It is heartbreaking and enraging to see children subjected to such inhumane treatment."

A recent U.S. Senate Finance Committee report "Warehouses of Neglect: How Taxpayers Are Funding Systemic Abuse in Youth Residential Treatment Facilities" (RTFs) noted: "Children, entrusted to the care of behavioral health providers, are routinely subjected to the risk of abuse…."  Further, children at RTFs suffer "sexual, physical, verbal, or emotional abuse at the hands of staff. Mistreatment is endemic to the conditions at RTFs."[2]

As testimony to this, since the report's release, a behavioral health associate at an Arkansas facility was arrested and charged with sexual indecency with a child patient. A lawsuit was filed against an Illinois RTF alleging that a staff member repeatedly sexually assaulted a 24-year-old patient. Moreover, one major behavioral hospital chain is paying a $400 million settlement in New Mexico related to children placed in a foster care setting where they were repeatedly sexually abused.[3]

CCHR says the abuses may be far greater. While the Senate report does not specify how many adolescents are subjected to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), it's known that several of the investigated hospital chains deliver it. For instance, at least three psychiatric hospitals downplay the risks of ECT while promoting unproven and potentially deceptive theories. As of 2018, one such facility in Florida conducted 900-1,000 ECT treatments annually and claims that the 460 volts of electricity delivered through the body is safe.

More on Aussie Journal

• $73.6M Pipeline, $10M Crypto Play & Legal Firepower: Why Investors Are Watching Cycurion (N A S D A Q: CYCU) Like a Hawk
• Grammy award-winning Cuban-Canadian artist Alex Cuba releases his 11th studio album, "Indole"
• Thread Advisory Group Launches to Help Retailers Turn Strategy Into Lasting Results
• QView Medical and Eve Wellness Announce Partnership to Advance Direct-to-Consumer Breast Cancer Screening With FDA-Approved AI
• Comparing Gastric Bypass and Gastric Sleeve: Dr. Niruben Rajasagaram Explains the Differences

Such claims of "safety" are particularly concerning when considering the financial incentives tied to ECT. The adverse effects of ECT can prolong the length of a hospital stay; thus, its delivery can increase profits.[4] The Senate report addresses how "At its core, the RTF model typically optimizes profit over the wellbeing and safety of children. The rampant civil rights violations that children experience in RTFs are a direct consequence of the industry's model."

ECT continues to be administered despite the World Health Organization (WHO) recommending it be banned for use in children and be considered torture if given without consent. A Tennessee RTF misleadingly claims on its website that ECT induces a "minor seizure that can help the brain reset itself…." and "modifies the neural circuitry and chemistry of the brain." However, no clinical trials exist to substantiate these claims.

Furthermore, the site falsely claims that ECT does not erase memories and blames any "brief memory impairment" on the anesthesia used to administer ECT, which "often returns over time." However, experts clearly link the memory loss to the electroshock.

John Read, Ph.D., who has researched the impact of ECT in many studies, points out that in 2023, the WHO and United Nations said, "ECT is not recommended for children, and this should be prohibited through legislation." Yet, he adds, "ECT is still being used on children and adolescents" and it is "probable that developing brains are particularly susceptible to the memory loss caused by ECT." Among ECT's many adverse effects, he wrote, "is the long-term memory loss found in between 12 and 55 percent of patients. The American Psychiatric Association admits that 'ECT can result in persistent or permanent memory loss.'"[5]

In a recent landmark decision, the California Supreme Court says there are serious risks from ECT like memory loss and brain damage. The court's decision emphasized that patients have the right to be fully informed about the risks of their treatments, and ECT device manufacturers can be held accountable for failing to disclose these risks.[6]

The troubling association between ECT and brain damage is further compounded by dozens of lawsuits that have been filed across the United States by survivors harmed by electroshock devices. ECT and brain damage have been inextricably linked since their inception, according to one Los Angeles law firm.[7]

More on Aussie Journal

• New Article Reveals Common Pricing Pitfalls in Flooring Projects — And How to Avoid Them
• Childrens Dentist: Advanced Technology for Stress-Free Treatments
• Airbus Defence and Space and Omnitronics Sign MoU to Advance Interoperability in Critical Communications
• Why Preventative HVAC Maintenance Saves You in the Long Run
• Company Loans – Why Timing and Evidence Matter

CCHR says more lawsuits are needed to help protect troubled youths from not only sexual and physical abuse in RTFS and youth "wilderness camps," but also the prescribed treatments they are given.

CCHR is calling for urgent and comprehensive action to protect vulnerable youth from pervasive abuses within psychiatric facilities. It urges increased legal scrutiny and accountability for institutions that administer harmful treatments, such as ECT and psychotropic drugs.

For those affected, CCHR offers a reporting form on its website where patients can confidentially REPORT ABUSE.

About CCHR:  Established in 1969 by the Church of Scientology and eminent professor of psychiatry, Dr. Thomas Szasz, CCHR has helped achieve hundreds of laws that empower patients with informed consent rights and ban damaging treatments.

Sources:

[1] "Alabama youth home staff instigated fights, gambled with residents as teen was brutalized, lawsuit claims," AOL.com, 27 Aug 2024, www.al.com/news/2024/08/alabama-youth-home-staff-instigated-fights-gambled-with-residents-as-teen-was-brutalized-lawsuit-claims.html

[2] Senate Finance Committee Staff Report, "Warehouses of Neglect: How Taxpayers Are Funding Systemic Abuse in Youth Residential Treatment Facilities," 12 June 2024, p. 11

[3] "Dem Candidate Lobbies For Healthcare Company Found to 'Put Profits Ahead of Children's Safety'" Nevada Globe, 12 Aug 2024

[4] Draper B, Luscombe G. Quantification of factors contributing to length of stay in an acute psychogeriatric ward. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 1998; 13:1–7

[5] John Read, Ph.D., "Is It Time to Ban Electroconvulsive Therapy for Children?" Psychology Today, 17 Nov. 2023, www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatry-through-the-looking-glass/202311/is-it-time-to-ban-electroconvulsive-therapy-for

[6] "Wisner Baum Prevails in Landmark Win for Patient Autonomy in CA Supreme Court Ruling," Wisner Baum, 20 June 2024, www.wisnerbaum.com/blog/2024/june/wisner-baum-prevails-in-landmark-win-for-patient/

[7] www.wisnerbaum.com/defective-medical-device-injuries/ect/